‘Honeycrisp’

REFUSAL – APPLIED-FOR MARK IS A CULTIVAR NAME Registration is refused because the applied-for mark is a cultivar name for the identified goods and as such, does not function as a trademark to indicate the source of applicant’s goods and to identify and distinguish them from others. Trademark Act Sections 1, 2, and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051-1052, 1127; see TMEP §1202.12.

The Universtiy of Minnesota claimed they had a trademark on the varietal name ‘Honeycrisp’ for over 20 years when no such trademark ever existed. Plant varietal names are inherently generic and thus can’t function as a trademark.

“Though UM will lose control of Honeycrisp propagation, it won’t lose control of the Honeycrisp name. The trademark and the patent are distinct, and the university still owns the trademark‘’ (Bedford)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s